翻訳と辞書 |
Walter v Lane : ウィキペディア英語版 | Walter v Lane
''Walter v Lane'' () AC 539, was a judgement of the House of Lords on the question of Authorship under the Copyright Act 1842. It has come to be recognised as a seminal case on the notion of originality in copyright law and has been upheld as an early example of the sweat of the brow doctrine.〔 〕 ==Facts== Reporters from ''The Times'' newspaper took down shorthand notes of a series of speeches given by the Earl of Roseberry, a prominent politician, and later transcribed them, adding punctuation, corrections and revisions to reproduce verbatim the speeches. These were then published in ''The Times''. The respondent in the case published a book including these speeches, taken substantially from the reports of those speeches in ''The Times''. The question for the court was whether the reporters of the speech could be considered "authors" under the terms of the Copyright Act.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Walter v Lane」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|